Opis

• Tytuł:
  Teoria rozumu publicznego a godność człowieka
• Twórca:
  Rupniewski, Michał
• Opis:
  In this paper I intend to point at an ambiguous interconnection between the theory of public reason (exemplified by John Rawls and Gerald Gaus), and the idea of human dignity understood as a universally binding, distinguished moral status and inherent value of every human person. The public reason theorist do not examine human dignity at length, whereas, as I am trying to show in the paper, it constitutes a necessary component of the theory. The argument for the necessity of human dignity within public reason boils down to the two main theses: (1) courts, international law bodies, as well as constitutional state authorities constantly refer to human dignity as a crucial commitment present in the law; and (2) public reason theory which sets human dignity aside suffers from an explanatory gap. As a way of providing a solution to this, I propose to examine the neo-thomist ethics developed by Tadeusz Styczeń. As I will show in the paper, combining an attempt the two theories is an interesting research program, and allows to reconcile both human dignity and public justifiability of legal rules.
• Dostępność obiektu:
  Dostęp otwarty
• Prawa:
  Prawa autorskie (c) 2018 Dialogi Polityczne
• Data:
  2017.10.16
• Typ:
  info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
  info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
• Język:
  polski
• Źródło:
  Political Dialogues; No. 23 (2017); 29-42;
  Dialogi Polityczne; Nr 23 (2017); 29-42;
  1730-8003
• Format:
  application/pdf
• Wydawca:
  Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
• Relacja: https://apcz.umk.pl/DP/article/view/DP.2017.013/15777
• Temat i słowa kluczowe:
  godność człowieka;
  rozum publiczny;
  neotomizm;
  Tadeusz Styczeń;
  John Rawls
• Identyfikator: https://apcz.umk.pl/DP/article/view/DP.2017.013
• Dostawca danych:
  Akademicka Platforma Czasopism
• Czy mogę z tego obiektu skorzystać?:
  poproś o pozwolenie
• Rodzaj zawartości:
  teksty