Szczegóły obiektu: Excessive procedural formalism as a violation of Article 6(1) of the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Instytucja dostarczająca:Platforma Otwartych Czasopism Naukowych UAM

Opis

Title:
Excessive procedural formalism as a violation of Article 6(1) of the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
Creator:
Szwed, Marcin
Description:
All judicial proceedings are inevitably based on the formalized procedures. Procedural provisions pursue many important objectives, such ensuring the effectiveness of proceedings or protecting legal certainty by regulating the competences of procedural bodies and the rights and duties of parties. At the same time, excessive procedural formalism may disproportionately limit the right to court, making access to court illusory. Within the framework of the European Convention on Human Rights, the permissible limits of procedural formalism are set by Article 6(1). The European Court of Human Rights, assessing whether excessive formalism has occurred in a given case, examines whether relevant formal requirements served a legitimate purpose, in particular legal certainty and proper administration of justice, and did not lead to a disproportionate restriction of the right of access to court. This assessment is made on the basis of all relevant circumstances of the case, such as the stage at which the proceedings were terminated, the type of proceedings, the party’s due diligence, the existence of circumstances justifying failure to comply with a formal requirement or the fact that the party was represented by a professional representative. Therefore, not only the content of national provisions is important, but also the manner of their application by courts.
Object availability:
Dostęp otwarty
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 ;
Prawa autorskie (c) 2020 WPiA UAM
Date:
2020.06.30
Type:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion;
peer-reviewed article;
Artykuł recenzowany
Language:
polski
Source:
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny; Vol. 82 No. 2 (2020); 123-136;
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny; Tom 82 Nr 2 (2020); 123-136;
2543-9170;
0035-9629
Format:
application/pdf
Publisher:
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Relation: http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/rpeis/article/view/24730/23499
Subject:
right to court;
excessive formalism;
limitations of the right to court;
ECtHR;
Article 6 of ECHR
Identifier: http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/rpeis/article/view/24730
Data provider:
Platforma Otwartych Czasopism Naukowych UAM

Podobne obiekty

Excessive procedural formalism as a violation of Article 6(1) of the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Twórca:Szwed, Marcin

Data:2020.06.30

Rodzaj zawartości:pozostałe

Violation of Labour Rights in the Context of Compulsory Vaccination Against Covid-19

Twórca:Yaroshenko, Oleg M. | Melnychuk, Nataliia O. | Prokopiev, Roman Ye. | Anisimova, Hanna V. | Kaplina, Halyna A.

Data:2022.12.13

Rodzaj zawartości:teksty

SEARCHING COMMON EUROPEAN STANDARDS REGARDING BLASPHEMY? ANALYSIS OF ITALIAN, IRISH, AUSTRIAN REGULATION FROM THE LIGHT OF THE ECHR

Twórca:Wiczanowska, Hanna Monika

Data:2019.06.26

Rodzaj zawartości:teksty

Wolność religijna w miejscu pracy w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka

Twórca:Bień, Alicja

Data:2024.07.10 | 2024.06.30

Rodzaj zawartości:obrazy

The Nullum Crimen Sine Lege Principle in the European Convention of Human Rights: The Actual Scope of Guarantees

Twórca:Rychlewska, Aleksandra

Data:2017.01.01

Rodzaj zawartości:obrazy

Memory Laws or Memory Loss? Europe in Search of Its Historical Identity through the National and International Law

Twórca:Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra

Rodzaj zawartości:pozostałe

Czy mogę z tego skorzystać?:poproś o pozwolenie

Termination of pregnancy – considerations in the light of the ruling of the Constitutional Court in the case K 1/20

Twórca:Szudejko, Piotr

Data:2022.06.10

Rodzaj zawartości:teksty

The Federal Constitutional Court Decisions: „The Right to be Forgotten I” and „The Right to be Forgotten II” – The Expectation of Increased Cooperation with the Concurrent Need to Maintain Independence

Twórca:Jaś-Nowopolska, Magdalena | Mengeler, Daniel

Data:2020.06.15

Rodzaj zawartości:teksty

Federacja Bibliotek Cyfrowych

Szczegóły obiektu: Excessive procedural formalism as a violation of Article 6(1) of the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Opis

Podobne obiekty