Opis

• Tytuł:
  ­A Defense of Analogy Inference as Sui generis
• Twórca:
  Juthe, André
• Opis:
  Accounts of analogical inference are usually categorized into four broad groups: abductive, deductive, inductive and sui generis. The purpose of this paper is to defend a sui generis model of analogical inference. It focuses on the sui generis account, as developed by Juthe [2005, 2009, 2015, 2016] and Botting’s [2017] criticism of it. This paper uses the pragmadialectical theory of argumentation as the methodological framework for analyzing and reconstructing argumentation. The paper has two main points. First, that Juthe’s arguments against a deductive interpretation of prima facie analogy argumentation remain unaffected by Botting’s criticism, which means that many of the reasons against deductive reformulation of analogy argumentation still stand. The additional argument, which Botting himself brings up, that a deductive interpretation cannot account for the cumulative effect of analogies, just provides further reason to reject deductivism. The second main point of this paper is that an inductive interpretation of analogical inference also fails. There are constitutional differences between inductive and analogical inference that cannot be bridged. The result is a firm defense of the sui generis view of analogical inference.
• Dostępność obiektu:
  Dostęp otwarty
• Prawa:
  Prawa autorskie (c) 2019 Logic and Logical Philosophy
• Data:
  2019.07.09
• Typ:
  info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
  info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion;
  pragma-dialectical
• Język:
  angielski
• Źródło:
  Logic and Logical Philosophy; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2020): June; 259-309;
  Logic and Logical Philosophy; Tom 29 Nr 2 (2020): June; 259-309;
  2300-9802;
  1425-3305
• Format:
  application/pdf
• Wydawca:
  Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
• Relacja: https://apcz.umk.pl/LLP/article/view/LLP.2019.025/17956
• Temat i słowa kluczowe:
  analogical inference;
  sui generis;
  deductivism;
  interpretation;
  argumentation theory;
  argument schemes;
  pragma-dialectical;
  relevant similarity;
  universal claim;
  one-to-one correspondence;
  determining relation;
  Argumentation theory
• Identyfikator: https://apcz.umk.pl/LLP/article/view/LLP.2019.025
• Dostawca danych:
  Akademicka Platforma Czasopism
• Czy mogę z tego obiektu skorzystać?:
  poproś o pozwolenie
• Rodzaj zawartości:
  pozostałe