Szczegóły obiektu: Judicial Interpretation of Legislation as a Source of Rules of Legislative Procedure and Legislative Drafting: a Comparative Study of United Kingdom and Nigerian Court Cases on Legislative Drafting

Instytucja dostarczająca:Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Opis

Tytuł:
Judicial Interpretation of Legislation as a Source of Rules of Legislative Procedure and Legislative Drafting: a Comparative Study of United Kingdom and Nigerian Court Cases on Legislative Drafting
Twórca:
Jaja, Tonye Clinton
Opis:
The quotations above encapsulate the essence of this research study. The underlying purpose of this research study is born out of the understanding that: “drafting style and practices are always capable of improvement”1.However, the traditional view is that legislators and legislative drafters are the major authors of legislative drafting conventions.This research study applies a novel approach to the study of legislative drafting considering that it examines “[s]ome (…) [legislative drafting] conventions [that] have statutory or case-law origins” such as the judgments in the cases of Bulmer v. Bollinger [1974] EWCA Civ. 14 and Pepper (Inspector of Taxes) v. Hart2.This novel approach is based on “Tetley’s three themes of comparative analysis in legislative drafting namely: rules of (statutory) interpretation, stare decisis and [legislative] drafting conventions and techniques”3. These themes of analysis are relevant when undertaking a study of comparative legislative drafting4 such as in this present study which is a comparative study of case studies in the United Kingdom and Nigeria. Unlike others, the legislative drafting conventions that originate from case law have the advantage of carrying the authority of law based on the common law doctrines of precedent and stare decisis.Besides case law, this research examines some modern theories, and innovations in the field of legislative drafting that common law judges may not be familiar with. It is hoped that “[t]his guide examines some legislative drafting conventions, the knowledge of which may help judges with statutory interpretation”5.This study also examines the common law rules of judicial precedent, stare decisis, and statutory interpretation that apply in Nigeria and the United Kingdom.The purpose is that such an examination will prove instructive to legislators and legislative drafters themselves when they prepare legislation. For example, by providing an analysis of the judgement in Bulmer v. Bollinger [1974] EWCA Civ. 14, this study makes a case for the inclusion of Purpose Clauses in common law legislation and the application of a purposive style of statutory interpretation.Collectively, the case law examined demonstrates that both United Kingdom and Nigerian Courts are “capable of endogenous (homegrown) development (…) to meet new technical problems or social needs”. The role of the Courts in this regard is “inevitable because it would be humanly impossible for the drafter or the legislator to draft legislation that would cover every situation”.
Dostępność obiektu:
Dostęp otwarty
Prawa:
Prawa autorskie (c) 2016 Comparative Law Review
Data:
2016.01.20
Typ:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Język:
angielski
Źródło:
Comparative Law Review; Tom 19 (2015); 149-201;
Comparative Law Review; Vol. 19 (2015); 149-201;
2391-7644;
0866-9449
Format:
application/pdf
Wydawca:
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
Relacja: https://apcz.umk.pl/CLR/article/view/CLR.2015.007/7565
Temat i słowa kluczowe:
statutory interpretation;
legislative drafting;
legislative procedures;
common law
Identyfikator: https://apcz.umk.pl/CLR/article/view/CLR.2015.007
Data provider:
Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Podobne obiekty

Judicial Interpretation of Legislation as a Source of Rules of Legislative Procedure and Legislative Drafting: a Comparative Study of United Kingdom and Nigerian Court Cases on Legislative Drafting

Twórca:Jaja, Tonye Clinton

Data:2016.01.20

Rodzaj zawartości:teksty

GRAMMATICAL ISSUES IN JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION – DOES LEGAL PRACTICE NEEDS LINGUISTIC THEORY? BASED ON POLISH COURTS’ DECISIONS

Twórca:ZEIFERT, Mateusz

Data:2019.01.04

Rodzaj zawartości:teksty

Marek Słupczewski, Inference per analogiam in tax law, Publisher: Wolters Kluwer, Warsaw 2022, ISBN 978-83-8328-722-5, pp. 335

Twórca:Brzeziński, Bogumił

Data:2024.05.08

Rodzaj zawartości:teksty

Doktryna consideration w angielskim prawie zobowiązań kontraktowych (XVI-XXI w.)

Twórca:Halberda, Jan

Data:2011.12.31

Rodzaj zawartości:teksty

Общественные блага и трагедия общин – проблема общей собственности

Twórca:Siebers, Adrianna

Data:2015.12.01

Rodzaj zawartości:teksty

War on terrorism and philosophy of law. Some remarks on the post-9/11 period

Twórca:Dobrzeniecki, Karol

Data:2013.12.15

Rodzaj zawartości:teksty

Przyczynienie się do powstania szkody w prawie cywilnym oraz jego aspekty prawnokarne

Twórca:Krajnik, Szymon | Ornowska, Alicja

Data:2011.06.01

Rodzaj zawartości:teksty

Rediscovering Blackstone: The influence of William Blackstone on the development of American legal science in the reception of Albert W. Alschuler

Twórca:Sokalska, Edyta

Data:2017.06.30

Rodzaj zawartości:pozostałe

Federacja Bibliotek Cyfrowych

Szczegóły obiektu: Judicial Interpretation of Legislation as a Source of Rules of Legislative Procedure and Legislative Drafting: a Comparative Study of United Kingdom and Nigerian Court Cases on Legislative Drafting

Opis

Podobne obiekty