Object's details: Gloss to resolution of Supreme Court of 20th November 2019, III CZP 3/19

Provider:Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Description

Title:
Gloss to resolution of Supreme Court of 20th November 2019, III CZP 3/19
Creator:
Balcerowski, Konrad
Description:
The aim of this article is to critically respond to the resolution of the Supreme Court of 20th November 2019 (III CZP 3/19). In the author’s opinion, the resolution of the Supreme Court deserves approval. In the current legal status, there is no possibility of a valid reservation of liquidated damages (in Polish literally referred as a contractual penalty) in case of withdrawal from the contract due to non-performance of an obligation of pecuniary nature. In the author’s opinion, this kind of reservation is contrary to the provisions concerning the legal nature of the statutory right of withdrawal (art. 491 et seq. of the Polish Civil Code), as well as provisions concerning liquidated damages (art. 483 et seq. of the Polish Civil Code). The author approves the final decision of the Supreme Court, however, is critical of its justification. In particular, he notices to the inaccuracies in the concept proposed by the Supreme Court explaining that the liquidated damages reserved in the analysed circumstances are considered invalid. Moreover, he draws attention to the technical and workshop issues of the justification, pointing to chaos and lack of clarity and transparency of the Supreme Court’s arguments.
Object availability:
free access
Rights:
Prawa autorskie (c) 2021 Studia Iuridica Toruniensia
Date:
2021.07.18
Type:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Language:
Polish
Source:
Studia Iuridica Toruniensia; Tom 27 (2020): Tom XXVII; 367-382;
Studia Iuridica Toruniensia; Vol. 27 (2020): Tom XXVII; 367-382;
2391-7873;
1689-5258
Format:
application/pdf
Publisher:
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopenika w Toruniu
Relation: https://apcz.umk.pl/SIT/article/view/SIT.2020.036/29324 ;https://apcz.umk.pl/SIT/article/view/SIT.2020.036/29325
Subject:
liquidated damages;
rescission of contract;
lex commissoria;
monetary performance;
non-performance of an obligation;
kara umowna;
odstąpienie od umowy;
świadczenie pieniężne;
niewykonanie zobowiązania
Identifier: https://apcz.umk.pl/SIT/article/view/SIT.2020.036
Data provider:
Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Similar objects

Gloss to resolution of Supreme Court of 20th November 2019, III CZP 3/19

Creator:Balcerowski, Konrad

Date:2021.07.18

Type:text

Traktowanie pandemii wywołanej chorobą COVID-19 jako siły wyższej w kontekście zobowiązań umownych oraz biegu terminu przedawnienia w polskim prawie cywilnym

Creator:Kozień, Kamila

Date:2022.02.21 | 2021.12.30

Type:image

Admissibility of the provisions regarding the contractual penalty in the event of rescission of the contract due to a breach of a (non) pecuniary obligation

Creator:Bykowicz, Karolina

Date:2021.12.15

Type:text

Liquidated damages for failure to pay or delayed payment of remuneration to subcontractors — comments on the background of the resolution of the Supreme Court of 30 June 2020,III CZP 67/19

Creator:Herl, Cyprian

Type:other

Can I use it?:check license | seek permission

Kara umowna a stosunek pracy

Creator:Nalepka, Arkadiusz

Date:2017.06.30

Type:text

Uwagi o rodzajach odpowiedzialności za wady rzeczy i wady prac badawczych w prawie polskim

Creator:Kosik, Jan (1919-2008)

Date:1990-01-01-1990-12-31 | 1990

Type:image

Premises and criteria for reducing the contractual penalty

Creator:Łazarewicz, Sylwia

Date:2022.09.16

Type:text

Problemy nauk prawnych : praca zbiorowa. T. 7

Date:2018

Type:other

Can I use it?:seek permission

Federacja Bibliotek Cyfrowych

Object's details: Gloss to resolution of Supreme Court of 20th November 2019, III CZP 3/19

Description

Similar objects