Object's details: An expressivist response to the infinite regress of interpretation argument against legal interpretivism

Provider:Platforma Otwartych Czasopism Naukowych UAM

Description

Title:
An expressivist response to the infinite regress of interpretation argument against legal interpretivism
Creator:
Wieczorkowski, Michał
Description:
The paper aims to address the Infinite Regress of Interpretation Argument against Legal Interpretivism by offering an expressivist defence. In this paper, Legal Interpretivism is understood as the view that determining the content of law requires interpreting its sources, where the correctness of interpretation depends on its alignment with the result of applying the proper method of interpretation to those sources. The Infinite Regress of Interpretation Argument posits that rules of interpretation necessitate further meta-rules for their application; these, in turn, necessitate further meta-meta rules, ad infinitum, rendering rules of interpretation incapable of grounding legal content. This line of reasoning leads to the conclusion that Legal Interpretivism ultimately collapses into a form of legal nihilism, suggesting that participants in legal discourse seeking to determine legal content are systematically in error. To counter this argument, the paper employs the division of linguistic labour thesis, which holds that the meaning of interpretive rules depends on what legal experts mean by them. Additionally, it utilizes a sceptical solution to the rule-following problem, suggesting that the function of meaning ascriptions is expressive rather than descriptive, which implies that meaning ascriptions do not require any foundational justifiers. Consequently, the paper argues that what legal experts mean by rules of interpretation halts the regress of interpretation. Ultimately, the paper concludes that by endorsing an expressivist stance, legal interpretivists can uphold their commitments without falling into legal nihilism.
Object availability:
free access
Rights:
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 WPiA UAM;
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Date:
2025.06.30
Type:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion;
peer-reviewed article;
Artykuł recenzowany
Language:
English
Source:
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny; Vol. 87 No. 2 (2025); 17-35;
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny; Tom 87 Nr 2 (2025); 17-35;
2543-9170;
0035-9629
Format:
application/pdf
Publisher:
Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
Relation: http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/rpeis/article/view/43427/39975
Subject:
legal interpretation;
expressivism;
regress of interpretation;
sceptical solution;
division of linguistic labour
Identifier: http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/rpeis/article/view/43427
Data provider:
Platforma Otwartych Czasopism Naukowych UAM

Similar objects

An expressivist response to the infinite regress of interpretation argument against legal interpretivism

Creator:Wieczorkowski, Michał

Date:2025.06.30

Type:other

Values in Jerzy Wróblewski’s legal theory

Creator:Leszczyński, Jerzy

Date:2013.12.15

Type:text

On the Normative Paradigm of Sworn Translation in the Realm of Law

Creator:Król, Małgorzata Z.

Date:2021.07.29 | 2020.09.30

Type:image

Prawo konsumenta do obniżenia całkowitego kosztu kredytu konsumenckiego – zarys problemu

Creator:Gnych-Pietrzak, Wiktor

Date:2021.09.30

Type:image

Cultural identity in the interpretation and judicial application of administrative law

Creator:Zirk-Sadowski, Marek

Date:2013.12.15

Type:text

Law and Literature – a Meaningful Connection

Creator:Škop, Martin

Date:2015.06.15

Type:text

Komunikowanie przekazu w modelach stosunków prawnych (na przykładzie przepisów „ Kodeksu pracy ”)

Creator:Lizisowa, Maria Teresa

Date:2021.02.19

Type:text

FAIRNESS AS INTERPRETIVE DEVICE IN LAW? (AN ANALYSIS OF DISCURSIVE PRACTICES IN THE RECENT CONFLICT ABOUT VOTING RIGHTS IN HONG KONG AND THEIR ANCHORAGE IN ARGUMENTATIVE PRACTICES OF EAST ASIA)

Creator:GALDIA, Marcus | LIACI, Antonio

Date:2016.01.01

Type:text

Federacja Bibliotek Cyfrowych

Object's details: An expressivist response to the infinite regress of interpretation argument against legal interpretivism

Description

Similar objects