Object's details: Marriage, Liberty and Constitution: a Corpusassisted Study of Value-Laden Words in Legal Argumentation

Provider:Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego

Description

Title:
Marriage, Liberty and Constitution: a Corpusassisted Study of Value-Laden Words in Legal Argumentation
Creator:
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
Contributor:
University of Łódź, Poland;
stanislaw.gozdz@uni.lodz.pl
Description:
This paper investigates the interplay between judicial argumentation and evaluative or emotive language identified in two US Supreme Court landmark cases on the right of same-sex couples to marry. The analysis of both majority and dissenting opinions leads to two main observations. First, marriage and liberty are indeed emotive words and they represent two major sites of contention between the concurring and dissenting judges. Second, there are important differences within the argumentative strategies employed by the judges. While (re)defining the concepts remains the major argumentative goal for both types of opinion, the majority opinions tacitly integrate the redefined concept of marriage into their argumentation. It is the dissenting opinions that explicitly raise the issue of (re)definition in order to defend and retain the original sense of marriage.
Object availability:
free access
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Date:
2021.02.22;
2019.03.30
Type:
Article
Language:
English
Format:
application/pdf
Publisher:
Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
Relation:
Research in Language;1;
17
Subject:
legal argumentation;
judicial discourse;
evaluative language;
US Supreme Court;
same-sex marriage
Identifier:
1731-7533;
http://hdl.handle.net/11089/33792 ;
10.2478/rela-2019-0006
Data provider:
Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego

Similar objects

Marriage, Liberty and Constitution: a Corpusassisted Study of Value-Laden Words in Legal Argumentation

Creator:Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław

Date:2021.02.22 | 2019.03.30

Type:image

Signalling Sites of Contention in Judicial Discourse. An Exploratory Corpus- Based Analysis of Selected Stance Nouns in US Supreme Court Opinions and Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal Judgments

Creator:GOŹDŹ-ROSZKOWSKI, Stanisław

Date:2017.12.06

Type:text

Exploring the Local Grammar of Evaluation: The Case of Adjectival Patterns in American and Italian Judicial Discourse

Creator:Pontrandolfo, Gianluca | Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław

Date:2015.06.12 | 2014.06.17

Type:other

Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective

Creator:Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław

Date:2025.01.15 | 2024.12.31

Type:image

Zwischen Ablehnung und Anerkennung. Katholische Stellungnahmen zur gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe in Deutschland

Creator:Goertz, Stephan

Date:2017.11.06

Type:text

U.S. Supreme Court in the civil rights era: Deliberative Democracy and its educative institutional role, 1950s–1970s

Creator:Figueroa, Carlos

Date:2019.04.03 | 2018

Type:image

Wymiar gatunkowy zdania odrębnego i jego uzasadnienia na przykładzie orzeczeń Trybunału Konstytucyjnego w Polsce. Zarys problematyki

Creator:Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław

Date:2021.04.26 | 2020

Type:text

The conception of an argument by analogy and examples of its application in the jurisprudence of administrative courts

Creator:Kowalewski, Kamil Piotr

Date:2017.03.31

Type:other

Federacja Bibliotek Cyfrowych

Object's details: Marriage, Liberty and Constitution: a Corpusassisted Study of Value-Laden Words in Legal Argumentation

Description

Similar objects