Description

• Title:
  Beall-ing O
• Creator:
  Joaquin, Jeremiah Joven
• Description:
  In “A neglected reply to Prior’s dilemma” Beall [2012] presents a Weak Kleene framework where Prior’s dilemma for Hume’s no-ought-fromis thesis fails. It fails in the framework because addition, the inference rule that one of its horns relies on, is invalid. In this paper, we show that a more general result is necessary for the viability of Beall’s proposal –  a result, which implies that Hume’s thesis holds in the proposed framework. We prove this result and thus show that Beall’s proposal is indeed viable.
• Object availability:
  free access
• Rights:
  Prawa autorskie (c) 2019 Logic and Logical Philosophy
• Date:
  2019.07.12
• Type:
  info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
  info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
• Language:
  English
• Source:
  Logic and Logical Philosophy; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2020): June; 213-221;
  Logic and Logical Philosophy; Tom 29 Nr 2 (2020): June; 213-221;
  2300-9802;
  1425-3305
• Format:
  application/pdf
• Publisher:
  Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
• Relation: https://apcz.umk.pl/LLP/article/view/LLP.2019.028/17990
• Subject:
  Beall;
  Hume’s Thesis;
  Prior’s Dilemma;
  Weak Kleene
• Identifier: https://apcz.umk.pl/LLP/article/view/LLP.2019.028
• Data provider:
  Akademicka Platforma Czasopism
• Can I use it?:
  seek permission
• Type:
  text