Description

• Title:
  A Realistic View on Normative Conflicts
• Creator:
  Glavaničová, Daniela;
  Pascucci, Matteo
• Description:
  Kulicki and Trypuz (2016) introduced three systems of multi-valued deontic action logic to handle normative conflicts. The first system suggests a pessimistic view on normative conflicts, according to which any conflicting option represents something forbidden; the second system suggests an optimistic view, according to which any conflicting option represents something obligatory; finally, the third system suggests a neutral view, according to which any conflicting option represents something that is neither obligatory nor forbidden. The aim of the present paper is to propose a fourth system in this family, which comes with a realistic view on normative conflicts: a normative conflict remains unsolved unless it is generated by two or more normative sources that can be compared. In accordance with this, we will provide a more refined formal framework for the family of systems at issue, which allows for explicit reference to sources of norms. Conflict resolution is thus a consequence of a codified hierarchy of normative sources.
• Object availability:
  free access
• Rights:
  Prawa autorskie (c) 2020 Logic and Logical Philosophy
• Date:
  2020.02.04
• Type:
  info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
  info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
• Language:
  English
• Source:
  Logic and Logical Philosophy; Vol. 29 No. 3 (2020): September; 447-462;
  Logic and Logical Philosophy; Tom 29 Nr 3 (2020): September; 447-462;
  2300-9802;
  1425-3305
• Format:
  application/pdf
• Publisher:
  Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
• Relation: https://apcz.umk.pl/LLP/article/view/LLP.2020.001/24704
• Subject:
  action;
  deontic logic;
  deontic value;
  multivalued logic;
  normative conflict
• Identifier: https://apcz.umk.pl/LLP/article/view/LLP.2020.001
• Data provider:
  Akademicka Platforma Czasopism
• Can I use it?:
  seek permission
• Type:
  text