Description

• Title:
  Are Artificial Sweeteners a Healthier Alternative to Sugar?
• Creator:
  Buszek, Julia;
  Czerniak, Piotr;
  Antoszewska, Adrianna;
  Bargiel, Weronika;
  Bąk, Dominika;
  Wajdowicz, Halszka;
  Warzocha, Mateusz;
  Medygrał, Michał;
  Buszek, Sylwia;
  Sokołowska, Aldona;
  Rumian, Maciej;
  Kosel, Alicja
• Description:
  Introduction Sweeteners are a common sugar alternative, especially in combating obesity and diabetes. With low calorie content, they appeal to health-conscious individuals. The food industry uses natural options like stevia or erythritol and synthetic ones such as aspartame or saccharin. While recognized as safe at recommended doses, debates continue about their long-term effects, emphasizing the need for further research. This paper explores the properties, benefits, and risks of sweeteners. Aim of the Study This study examines the effects of sweeteners on human health and evaluates their suitability as sugar substitutes for modern consumers, highlighting their benefits and potential risks. Materials and Methods An analysis of PubMed papers was conducted using keywords: sweeteners, artificial sweeteners, erythritol, acesulfame potassium, sucralose, aspartame, and sugar alternatives. Basic Results Both natural and synthetic sweeteners are used as sugar substitutes to address concerns about excessive sugar intake. Research indicates they help reduce calorie consumption and control blood sugar levels. However, uncertainties remain about their long-term health effects. Some studies suggest possible changes in metabolism or gut microbiota, but evidence is inconclusive. Regulatory bodies like the FDA deem approved sweeteners safe within recommended daily limits. Despite their advantages, further research is needed to fully understand their long-term impact. Conclusion Sweeteners are gaining popularity as sugar alternatives, particularly in the context of obesity and diabetes. Their variety allows for diverse dietary applications. While safe within recommended doses, questions about their long-term effects persist. They aid in weight control and glucose regulation but are not universally suitable. A balanced approach and further research are crucial.
• Object availability:
  free access
• Rights:
  Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Julia Buszek, Piotr Czerniak, Adrianna Antoszewska, Weronika Bargiel, Dominika Bąk, Halszka Wajdowicz, Mateusz Warzocha, Michał Medygrał, Sylwia Buszek, Aldona Sokołowska, Maciej Rumian, Alicja Kosel;
  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
• Date:
  2025.02.10
• Type:
  info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
  info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
• Language:
  English
• Source:
  Quality in Sport; Tom 38 (2025); 58150;
  Quality in Sport; Vol. 38 (2025); 58150;
  2450-3118
• Format:
  application/pdf
• Publisher:
  University Center for Sports Research, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
• Relation: https://apcz.umk.pl/QS/article/view/58150/41461
• Subject:
  sweeteners;
  artificial sweeteners;
  erythritol;
  acesulfame potassium;
  sucralose;
  aspartame;
  alternative to sugar
• Identifier: https://apcz.umk.pl/QS/article/view/58150
• Data provider:
  Akademicka Platforma Czasopism
• Can I use it?:
  seek permission
• Type:
  text