Description

• Title:
  Once more on analytic vs. synthetic
• Creator:
  Materna, Pavel
• Description:
  The boundary between analytic and synthetic sentences is well definable. Quine’s attempt to make it vague is based on a misunderstanding: instead of freeing semantics from shortcomings found, e.g. in Carnap’s work, Quine actually rejects semantics of natural language and replaces it by behavioristically articulated pragmatics. Semantics of natural language as a logical analysis is however possible and it can justify hard and fast lines between analyticity and syntheticity.
• Object availability:
  free access
• Rights:
  Prawa autorskie (c) 2017 Logic and Logical Philosophy
• Date:
  2007.07.25
• Type:
  info:eu-repo/semantics/article;
  info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
• Language:
  English
• Source:
  Logic and Logical Philosophy; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2007); 3-43;
  Logic and Logical Philosophy; Tom 16 Nr 1 (2007); 3-43;
  2300-9802;
  1425-3305
• Format:
  application/pdf
• Publisher:
  Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu
• Relation: https://apcz.umk.pl/LLP/article/view/LLP.2007.001/1466
• Subject:
  analytic;
  synthetic;
  intensions;
  constructions;
  concepts;
  pragmatics
• Identifier: https://apcz.umk.pl/LLP/article/view/LLP.2007.001
• Data provider:
  Akademicka Platforma Czasopism
• Can I use it?:
  seek permission
• Type:
  text